On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Aaron W. Hsu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why should it not affect the expansion of `quasiquote'? If you are using > the R6RS language of Racket, then rebinding unquote is required to alter > the behavior of `quasiquote'.
May l assume this is just an implementation detail of plt-scheme and that the exact behavior is left unspecified in R6RS/R7RS? Thanks everyone for all the useful information. I've already changed my implementation so that ELSE and => in COND can be rebound . The questions regarding QUASIQUOTE and QUOTE were simply a result of extrapolating the same reasoning to other constructs and, frankly speaking, I'm still a bit confused about it. However, if the consensus is that the macro hygiene is not a concern (or is not affected) here I'm perfectly OK with that. Thanks, Andrzej _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
