Good morning Peter! WHAT THE HAPS! On Wed 11 May 2011 18:26, Peter Bex <[email protected]> writes:
> If R7RS only specifies what happens when you do > > (define-syntax (syntax-rules ...)) or > (define-syntax (er-macro-transformer ...)) that doesn't shut out > the possibility of syntax-case, does it? Well, no. You're right. > The other way around it does shut out implementations like Chicken > where the "er-macro-transformer" line is more or less optional > because that's its native system. It's probably just wishful thinking, but it would be nice if we used the same arities here, though... I don't want to be all imperialist and say "hey chickeners! you must change your thing!", but the single-arity transformers might even be better for yall as well (for source information, for example; though is that a red herring?). Consider it! :) Peace, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
