On Thu 19 May 2011 20:10, John Cowan <[email protected]> writes:
> Andy Wingo scripsit: >> Perhaps elide the mention of `nil'. It should be fairly well-known now. > > Not as long as CL still exists. I meant to say that anyone who knows about `nil' is probably aware that Scheme does it differently. FWIW, there are more programmers out there who think that 0 is false, so if anything were to be noted, it would be that; but I don't think it's Scheme's place to do either. Just MHO :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
