On Thu, 19 May 2011, John Cowan wrote: > Andy Wingo scripsit: > >> Why not specify `close-port' instead of `close-input-port' and >> `close-output-port' ? Is there any benefit that having two procedures >> when one would do, except compatibility? (Because if it's simply for >> compatibility, one can provide shims.) > > Scheme isn't big on generic procedures, ...
Scheme has many generic procedures, such as port?, read, write, display, cons, +, -, *, /, <, >, <=, >=, sin, etc. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
