On 05/19/2011 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Medernach wrote:
> PS: For me the real problem is elsewhere: I really dislike to have a
> value which is an unspecified one, I prefer instead that implementations
> return nothing - as in (values)
In Kawa set! returns no values. I think this makes the REPL nicer:
set!, define, and similar forms return no values, which prints out as
nothing.
--
--Per Bothner
[email protected] http://per.bothner.com/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
