On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > Table B.1 is swine before pearls; there's a back-handed compliment for > you! Basically the whole document has a hearty schemey flavor, like a > good traditional meal, yet with sawdust as dessert. > > Suggestion: move (most of) the features to a SRFI, where adequate space > can be allotted to their definition.
I agree it is out of place, but think we should move it to WG2. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
