On 05/23/11 13:18, Eli Barzilay wrote: > 20 minutes ago, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: >> On 05/22/11 22:53, Andre van Tonder wrote: >> >>> But if WG1-voted decisions are written in stone as you say, then >>> it makes little sense for this discussion group to even continue. >>> What was the point then of making the draft public? I will >>> henceforth stop my "moaning"/participation here. I wish you good >>> luck. >> >> No! Don't do that! >> >> By all means vent frustration by shouting at each other, but don't >> let that get in the way of working together to make Scheme great. >> >> Fatalism and anger will only lead to R7RS just being another R6RS - >> swinging too far to the other extreme, driven by rage and bile. > > Do you realize that Andre has poured *tons* of efforts on r6rs? I > somehow doubt that characterizing it as "driven by rage and bile" is > going to make him happy.
I didn't mean R6 was driven by rage and bile, just that R7 would be driven to the opposite extreme by rage and bile if things get out of hand! ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
