On 07/07/11 18:52, John Cowan wrote: > As I've pointed out before, application programmers don't really need to > make their code portable between Schemes any more, because each Scheme > (with a very few exceptions) is itself highly portable. It's library > programmers that really need and benefit from standardization.
+1 An app that doesn't use any non-portable features (GUIs? Means of packaging apps for distribution, even?) is often rather boring. This is also why I'd like to leave REPL semantics vague... ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
