Hi, While reviewing the current draft, I started to wonder: now that many things have been already voted on and the changes introduced in the coming draft(s) won't be that big anymore (I guess?), it would be time to slowly find out how the resonance of the implementations' authors is with regard to supporting the standard, especially the module/library system. However, it doesn't seem as if there were any feedback from implementors yet.
How about approaching the implementors directly and ask them if they would implement the standard in its current state, or what they think would have to change for them to add support for it? It would be sad if we had R6RS all over again. (For instance, in my journey to write a portable C FFI layer, I am right now really suffering from the Scheme community not having a portable module mechanism that works across the major Scheme systems...) Regards, Denis _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
