Andre van Tonder scripsit: >> 0.0 just means a number x such that 0 < x < the smallest representable >> inexact number. > > I think that's a contradiction in terms. :) If inexact numbers like > 0.0 represent intervals, then the smallest representable inexact > number is presumably also an interval, and cannot be the endpoint of > an interval.
Yes. I should have said "the smallest positive number representable as a flonum." -- Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your John Cowan ear. However, I would suggest you wash your [email protected] hands thoroughly before going to the toilet. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --gadicath _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
