---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Felix <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Alex Shinn did a poll on the "scheme-implementors" mailing list recently (a non-public mailing list hosted by google groups) and from what I could see (not much, I assume most implementors gave their opinion privately to the editors), many implementors seem to be fine with the draft. It is not so different from R5RS, and the module system looks straightforward enough (WG1 doesn't touch the tricky issues like procedural macros and phase-separation, etc. - it only requires "syntax-rules"). So, I think the draft is taken positively, at least by those that aren't too committed to R6RS. (Note: I asked to be unsubscribed from scheme-implementors, so I can't give any more information) cheers, felix -- -alex http://www.artisancoder.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
