John Cowan scripsit: > > One final question: Why was the +nan.0 syntax copied from R6RS but not > > the -nan.0 syntax? I think it makes sense to allow -nan.0 as well. > > It was an oversight. Ticket filed.
Racket, Gauche, Chicken, Guile, Chez, Ikarus, Larceny, Ypsilon, STklos all support nan.0 and +nan.0 as equivalent forms. MIT, Bigloo, Scheme48/scsh, SISC, SCM, Scheme 9 don't support either form. Only Gambit and Chibi support +nan.0 but not -nan.0. STklos prints both +nan.0 and -nan.0 as -nan.0. -- De plichten van een docent zijn divers, John Cowan die van het gehoor ook. [email protected] --Edsger Dijkstra http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
