On Fri 24 Feb 2012 16:23, Jussi Piitulainen <[email protected]> writes:
>> (define t 1) >> (define-syntax define-const >> (syntax-rules () >> ((_ var val) >> (begin >> (define t val) >> (define (var) t))))) >> (define-const foo 2) >> t >> > Is it different from the following? > > (define t 1) > (define t 2) > (define (foo) t) > t Yes. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.reports/304/focus=393 Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
