On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: > Thanks for the info. I've improved the "numbers" test suite (which I'd > like to remind everone can also be used for testing other R5RS Schemes, > and for R8RS Schemes if the tests for padding syntax are removed) to > include these cases: > http://bugs.call-cc.org/browser/release/4/numbers/trunk/tests/string-conversion.scm
s/R8RS/R7RS/. Let's not get ahead of things ;) Also, the nan/inf things need to be removed for R5RS Schemes, I think. These tests actually test for a hybrid of R5RS/R7RS syntax (which is useful for Schemes like Chicken that will probably aim to support both). Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
