quad writes: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote: > > May I point out that this last one is now a non-argument. "@" was > > already freed and can be used in symbols and identifiers. > > Perhaps it is a mistake, but the "@" syntax is in the formal grammar > for complex numbers in the R7RS draft. > > Or perhaps you mean you're still able to use "@" despite it being > specified for complex number construction.
Of course I mean the latter. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
