On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We haven't generally made a distinction for a result being
> "implementation-defined", simply saying "unspecified."  Thus
> with either the R3RS or current R7RS, for the specific question
>
>  (= 0.0 -0.0) => ?
>
> the ? would be written "unspecified".

Where by "=" I of course mean "eqv?".

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Reply via email to