On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Mike Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > In the grammar of the sixth "small" draft, I noticed two small issues for the > <comment> rule (section 7.1.1). > > 1) In the first choice of the <comment> rule, it lists <all subsequent > characters up to a line break>. However, the spec does not define exactly > what constitutes a line break. > > 2) The third choice of the rule uses <atmosphere> to separate `#;' from the > datum it comments. However, the <atmosphere> rule will match exactly one > comment or whitespace character, which is surely not what is intended. This > could be fixed by using <intertoken space> in its place.
Thanks Mike, both fixed. Note there was rough consensus earlier that line break should be NL, CR+NL and CR, but not the Unicode NEL, so I'm going with that. If someone disagrees we can file a ticket. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
