On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:43 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In my opinion, providing a way to test for signaling NaNs is all we should
> do.
>
>
Thanks for the quote, I agree with you and have removed signaling NaN
constructors from the wiki.

Cheers,
--
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Reply via email to