Richard Kelsey scripsit:
> Summary: The list of cases where eqv? returns #t does not mention procedures.
Formal comment ticket #423 filed. Ticket #125 reopened to revote this.
We will also be revoting the behavior of `eqv?` around 0.0 vs. -0.0 and
around NaNs.
When the WG votes, #423 will be closed and a formal response will
be sent. If the WG votes to change the draft, #125 will be changed
after it is changed.
--
Don't be so humble. You're not that great. John Cowan
--Golda Meir [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
