Perry E. Metzger scripsit: > As a general process question: could WG1 vote in the "English" part > of the spec and later amend it with a completed formal semantics > (possibly with some minor patches to deal with ambiguities > discovered in the course of creating them)? The formal semantics might > take a while, but it would be a shame not to have them.
Yes, I agree; however, the completed formal semantics can be issued as a separate document by a separate WG, with no need for amendment. Patches we might need, though I hope not. -- Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) [email protected] _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
