On Mon 20 Aug 2012 16:42, Alaric Snell-Pym <[email protected]> writes:
> However, WG1 has proven too afraid of innovating and getting it wrong to > suggest anything more than hinting at the implementations to be > Sufficiently Smart about garbage collection of continuations (which is > perhaps the only complete solution to "can this scope ever be > re-entered?" questions). Guile and Racket and many other Schemes have continuation barriers. I am not asking for innovation. A simple "the port is closed if the procedure returns normally, or if an exception is raised inside and caught outside." text is all that is needed. If this is incompatible with raise-continuable, raise-continuable should be left out of this report IMO. Stubbornly yours, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
