Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Per Bothner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I assume you mean that Chez modules are be so > > *fundamentally* different from other module systems > > that it would be need a huge and unreasonable re-write > > that it would not be reasonable for R7RS. > > More or less. What I actually mean is that > it should be trivial to define a static translation > between R7RS library declarations and any > existing module system. As per my other email, I am not suggesting that we change any of our previous votes for the module system. I agree with you here about the least common denominator. What I am suggesting is not what you seem to think that I am. I am merely suggesting a way to fix the semantics that makes everything cleaner. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
