Alan Watson scripsit: > However, I'm not losing too much sleep. I suspect that implementations > that have signed zero but are not IEEE will implement a fast native > eqv? that behaves as (eqv? -0.0 +0.0) => #f and a slower R7RS eqv? that > behaves as (eqv? -0.0 +0.0) => #t.
Indeed. Or simply violate the letter of the R7RS. > The R7RS library system makes this quite easy to implement this. For > this, and of course for much else, the editors should be highly > commended. Thank you. Credit should go to the entire WG, who made essentially all the decisions other than presentational ones. I say "essentially" because the editors occasionally went beyond the letter of votes where the intent seemed sufficiently clear. -- Dream projects long deferred John Cowan <[email protected]> usually bite the wax tadpole. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --James Lileks _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
