On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > The paragraph and example of eqv? on procedures with local state are > superfluous
Yes, this was left over from R5RS but is no longer particularly interesting. I've tentatively removed it. > In 6.2.4, "A NaN always compares false to any number, including a NaN". > I thought the result of the discussion was that (eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0) > could be #t? I didn't really follow it anyway. > This is in the numbers section, so we're talking only about arithmetic operations here, i.e. `=', `<', '>', '<=' and '>='. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
