On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Aaron W. Hsu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 11:43 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > > I have two problems with it. One is that very few Schemers have used > > it. I asked on this list once who had used it, and no one replied in > > the affirmative. Therefore it is not "core" enough to go into a > > "small" r7rs. > > I must object to this. Firstly, I use raise-continuable all the time in > various things that I do, and most of the exception systems that I have > seen in Scheme have some equivalent form to this form. Moreover, the > distinction between raise and raise-continuable is one that I have found > useful in practice. > I agree.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
