On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:22 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Given the late stage of this reversal the WG has asked the SC if it has >> any objections. If there are none, the full text will be posted later. >> Voting on the unmodified ninth draft will continue as before; this change >> will appear in the tenth draft. >> > > The SC has objected to making this change while the vote is ongoing. > Note this means that the current votes are for draft 9, as is. The concern from the SC was that not only was changing mid-vote confusing, but that there may be other issues brought up which could also deserve special attention. The WG is working to get this change accepted somehow after the vote. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
