Aaron W. Hsu scripsit: > You lose the ability to separately compile modules, so they do not > replace compilation units like `define-library`,
Can you update LetSyntaxArcfide into a proposal for WG2 that supplements rather than replaces `define-library`? I would be glad to consider such a thing. > but they excel at replacing `let-syntax` or for modularizing circularly > dependent code. Please try to keep a grip on the fact that R7RS-small `let-syntax`, like the R5RS version, is a scope rather than being spliced into the surrounding scope. See ticket #48 and WG1Ballot2Results. -- How comes city and country to be filled with drones John Cowan and rogues, our highways with hackers, and all [email protected] places with sloth and wickedness? http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --W. Blith, Eng. Improver Improved, 1652 _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
