Grant Rettke scripsit: > >From what you said, would WG2 define the large language as WG1-small + > a bunch of SRFIs?
In essence. There may be some places where R7RS-small says MAY or SHOULD and we think that R7RS-large should say MUST (see the pages ImplementationsMay and ImplementationsShould). In addition, there may be a few things like `hex-digit-value` that are too trivial to be a SRFI, or something like implicit vs. explicit phasing that doesn't fit the SRFI model. In addition, some SRFIs may themselves be MUSTs (I'm going to propose that comparators be required, because the library is small but the reuse value in other libraries is large), whereas the rest are SHOULDs. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --The Hobbit _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
