Sanel Zukan scripsit: > Is this means that we are no longer allowed to write and support > someting like: > > (define (1+x x) (+ 1 x)) > > ?
If you are an implementer, you certainly can provide such a procedure. If you are a user, and you care about standards conformance, you should choose a different identifier, as 1+x has never been a standards-conformant identifier under *any* version of the Scheme standard. However, most Scheme implementations will accept 1+x as a valid identifier. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org In computer science, we stand on each other's feet. --Brian K. Reid _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
