Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer scripsit: > Should `set-queue-from-list!' and `set-queue-from-first-last!' not be > called `set-queue-list!' and `set-queue-first-last!'?
Changed to `queue-set-list!` and `queue-set-first-last!`. > I'm not sure when `queue-concatenate' should be used in code that > wants to be portable. If no limit is defined for the length of the > argument list of `apply', then I can only do guesswork. In my test suite of Schemes, the most limited is RScheme with a limit of 998 arguments. See <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ApplyArgsLimit> for details. > And the whole thing seems like a huge kludge; can implementations > with such a limit not solve the issue in a way other than to burden > not only the programmer but even the whole standard? I'm tracking `list-concatenate` from SRFI 1, `string-concatenate` from SRFI 13, and `vector-concatenate` from SRFI 43. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org Economists were put on this planet to make astrologers look good. --Leo McGarry _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
