On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler <sch...@speechcode.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Shiro Kawai <shiro.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> (Oops, I only replied this to Alex. For the record, resending to >> scheme-reports.) >> >> I'm in favor of this feature but I don't push this to be included in r7rs >> errata. >> I agree it's too big change, and it's best to leave it undefined for now >> (or, an error in r7rs-sense). >> > > I agree on both counts. This is not an oversight, not simply a mistake, > and hence shouldn't be considered an erratum. > Well, it was just an oversight on my part, but since you're disagreeing as a WG member I won't push and we'll have to leave this unspecified. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
