Here's a copy of a letter I recently sent both papers. 
Sharon
 
 
    Two weeks ago the School Board unanimously approved a plan to deal with excess capacity in school buildings.  Depending on the outcome you wanted, you are either pleased or not. I would ask you to look beyond our budget quibbling at the local level, and for a moment, consider the bigger picture. 
    While school officials debate how to save nickels by comparing the cost of educating kids in this building or that building, millions of budget-breaking dollars gush out of WAPS every year.  It is certainly true that we have been locally responsible with our budget - WAPS has an ultra-conservative average of only 1% annual increase in spending over the past five years.  Our employees took salary freezes, and local citizens passed a referendum.  Yet, we are always in a financial crunch.  What is going on?  Why can't we ever seem to catch up?
    Across Minnesota, school districts are forced to be responsible for some State and Federal failures.  I'll give you only two examples of many.  If we called the Federal legislators what we call dads who renege on child-support, we'd call them "deadbeat Feds."  In the 1970's, the Feds passed laws mandating educational standards for students with disabilities.  That was a good thing.  They promised to pay 40% of the Special Education costs.  That also was a good thing.  But, they have never kept their promise.  That is not only bad, it is devastating.  By law, WAPS pays about $1.3 million every year to cover the Federal Government's share of expenses.  We lose the local ability to spend those millions on different things.  Basically, we are stuck with the Fed's bill, and since no one here likes running a budget in the red, we cut our own local teachers, programs and services to pay for the Fed's end.  Is that fair?
    Another funding problem comes from our State legislators.  Transportation funding is inequitable.  Every school district gets about the same dollars per student for bussing.  What legislators fail to acknowledge is that rural districts like Winona have a lot of ground to cover to bring their kids to school compared to big city districts.  WAPS busses students from Minneiska to Dakota, covering over 260 square miles of valleys, bluffs and niches.  Metro districts drive around densely-populated neighborhoods to pick up their kids, but they get the same dollars per student whether they travel 20 blocks or 20 miles.  That means WAPS loses about $600,000 out of our own pocket every year covering the State's transportation inequity.  We could be spending those hundreds of thousands in a better way.  Again, we want to have a responsible-looking bottom line, so we cut and hack our way through our own Winona programs, buildings and personnel to cover the State's end.  Is that right?
    These are only two examples of how much more stable our local school districts would be if the State and Federal Government would step up to their promises and responsibilities.  I am very comfortable in making tough decisions required at a local level when it is a local issue, but I chafe at balancing the budget on the backs of children when the financial drain originates at State and Federal level.  Winona kids lose out on over $2 million of opportunties every year!  Leaders higher up the food chain than me must accept their responsibilities, make their own "tough decisions," and stop expecting local taxpayers to fill the gaps with referendum dollars and chopped up school districts.  Fortunately, U.S. Senator Paul Wellstone is persistently banging the drums out in Washington for the Feds to pony up. We'll see if they do.
    You can understand by looking at the bigger picture of Minnesota's education funding that local efforts to contain costs and be financially responsible, no matter how vigilant, are inevitably doomed.  Unless something major changes.  I believe it can and will.  But major changes must occur at the State and Federal level, so that Minnesota public schools are not set up for failure.                 
    Local communities should not continue to suck up the budgetary inadequacies and inequities dumped on us by higher-ups.  Enough is enough.    

Reply via email to