2012/6/21 Douglas Cerna <[email protected]>:
> Gediminas:
>
> The section_locations.txt stest made me realize that the ommited_items check 
> added in revision 3423 breaks the /resources view (and probably others). 
> Those ommit methods should return lists, or you'll get a permission error on 
> the btree. I fixed them in revision 3425.

It is strange why we would get a permission error. The fix was done to
avoid creating lists. A copy is still done in TableBatch. I reverted
your fixed and moved the len() call to where we do have a list.

> The expand_container change made relationships views to use the whole width, 
> which looks weird to me in some cases:
>
> http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/8021/pantallazodel2012062113.png
> http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/8021/pantallazodel2012062113.png
>
> Was this style change an accident?

No, the style fix was intentional. I wanted a table with many columns
to fill whole page width, and found that NoSidebarPage is used for
that. But its style was expand_container that was not defined
anywhere. So I made use of existing style and fixed form header in
such pages.

However, FlourishRelationshipViewBase and EditRelationships, plus
FlourishContactAddView and FlourishContactEditView, extend
NoSidebarPage. So they get the fixed style. I think they should extend
Page instead.

-- 
Gediminas

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~schooltool-developers
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~schooltool-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to