Sorry, I had replied to dave only. I thought the list would Reply-To itself by default but that doesn't seem to be the case.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, David Schleef <d...@entropywave.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:10:11PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote: >> Do you expect all users to find this out and set ORCC directly? Is >> this even documented anywhere? > > Almost all users get schroedinger from a distribution. The small > fraction of users that compile themselves are mostly compiling for > local use. For the small fraction of those people that are cross > compiling or building packages for a distribution, I expect that > they can figure these things out. >> Could you please give more examples on what other tools follow this? > > In a few minutes of searching, I found: > Qt > glib > ORBit Does each distributor also have to waste time finding out if there is an ORCC-like variable hidden somewhere that must be set to something specific for each of these tools? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Schrodinger-devel mailing list Schrodinger-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel
