On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:06 AM, David Schleef <d...@entropywave.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:00:04PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote: >> $subj, not tested on pw32. >> >> This should make the allocated code executable so it may run from >> Win64. But I assume there is no Win64 calling convention implemented >> yet, so it still crashes all the time. > > Is memory allocated by malloc() not executable on Win64?
That's right, it's not executable. > This patch is not acceptable as-is, since it removes the malloc() This patch makes the malloc() case unused. It's still left there if you want to reuse it later. From what I understood, only the win32 targets were using malloc(), right? > case. Would you like to fix it up, or would you like me to hack > up an untested patch? (By the way, the VirtualAlloc() does work > on Win32, and I'm indifferent as to which method it uses.) I'm too lazy to fix it up, I'd rather test the hacked up patch =). But if it works on Win32 then it should work on Win64 as well (except for the calling convention). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Schrodinger-devel mailing list Schrodinger-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel
