Hello Tim,

   thanks for your reply.

     Hi,

     I would be interested to hear the results of experiments comparing
     Dirac Pro and J2K. I assume you will be comparing Intra Dirac,
     i.e. Dirac Pro/SMPTE VC-2, with J2K?


   yes, I'm playing with I-frames only atm and I want to see how much I
   can get. When I played with j2k I got an impression that there's still
   a lot of redundancy in hi-freq subbands which j2k just ignores. Then I
   looked into Dirac model and  - bingo! - I found something that looked
   close to how I thought it should be...

   I will probably try to merge j2k model into Dirac and try it. I will
   let you know the results then...



     As you say Dirac Pro's entropy modelling is quite different to
     J2K. I doubt it yields a higher compression ratio - the objective
     with Dirac Pro was to produce a simpler, less complex solution
     rather than a higher compression ratio. However I would add that,
     because Dirac Pro takes care to preserve the DC precision it can
     have fewer visual artefacts than J2k (even if PSNR figures don't
     show this). I say this because we have noticed that J2K, used for
     video, can produce an annoying DC flicker even at quite low
     compression ratios.


   so if I correctly understand if I apply my j2k-based model to Dirac's
   quantization output then I avoid this problem?

   also it's a bit unexpected [for me] - I thought if you want to be
   potentially faster then I'd expect you to split your data into the
   small independent blocks for parallelization but not process it
   hierarchically? 


     I did some (unpublished) experiments a few years ago comparing J2K
     and Dirac Pro. With arithmetic coding enabled the compression
     efficiency (for lossless coding) was almost identical for the two
     codecs (some images were 1 or 2% better with one codec and the
     other way round for other images). Interestingly when arithmetic
     coding was disabled, so that entropy coding was only the fixed
     variable length coding (interleaved exp-Golomb), the compression
     efficiency of Dirac Pro only dropped by 20%. That is for lossless
     coding arithmetic coding only appeared to give a compression gain
     of 1.25. Given that arithmetic coding adds significantly to the
     complexity of the codec some applications may prefer the option of
     not using arithmetic coding in Dirac Pro for lower complexity at
     the expense of slightly reduced compression.


   In this direction I want to try to build a relatively big transition
   table and use a q-coder. I hope that once the transition table is
   tuned to specific [family of] PDFs it can give good results (i.e.
   close to the real arithmetic coder). However I still didn't read what
   theory says about the size of the table vs efficiency, so if it's
   grows exponentially then it's possibly not going to work...



     At the moment there are low delay profile hardware implementations
     of Dirac Pro/SMPTE VC-2 available from Numedia Technology and from
     Westwood Rock. Software implementations are available in the Open
     Source Schroedinger software and from Entropy Wave.


   thx for the info.

   Regards,
   Vladimir



     Regards

     Tim

     Dr Tim Borer
     Lead Engineer
     BBC Research & Development
     BBC Centre House
     56 Wood Lane
     London     W12 7SB

     At 20:46 30/10/2010, javasharp...@ukr.net wrote:

       Hi,

       I want to do some experiments with dirac and j2k and I have a
       question. As I see dirac's entropy modelling is totally
       different from that of j2k. It would be interesting to know
       the rationale behind it. In particular if the j2k's entropy
       modelling (together with the dirac's arithmetic encoder which
       as I understans is more effective than j2k's quasi-arithmetic
       encoder) what size decrease can be expected?

       Thanks in advance,
       Vladimir


       
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North
       America contest
       Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in 
       U.S. and Canada
       $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly
       $6M in marketing
       Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to
       Ovi Store
       http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
       _______________________________________________
       Schrodinger-devel mailing list
       Schrodinger-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel


       No virus found in this incoming message.
       Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
       Version: 9.0.864 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3225 - Release
       Date: 10/28/10 18:34:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Schrodinger-devel mailing list
Schrodinger-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel

Reply via email to