On 11/07/10 13:26, Pascal Georges wrote: Hi!
>> Well, the repertoir editor isn't much worked at lately. Mainly cause >> tree based masks seem to offer a better implementation of repertoir >> handling. Are you aware of that function? How does it compare to you >> with the repertoir editor? Is it a good substitute or better or should >> we keep the repertoir editor? > > Alexander, you point something important. Having both Repertoire > Editor and the Tree Mask is confusing. %s/is/can be/g ;) > My opinion is that the > Repertoire Editor should be simply removed from Scid as it is > completely superseded by the Tree Mask They are different in some way and very similar in another, but as we now have the function to also search for a given line within a tree mask I tend to agree. I moved to the masks entirely, I admit. Other opinions here? It would really be good to get some feedback from the users. > (and it is the same for the Opening Trainer, I think). Are you sure about this one? Other opinions? > One has to have the courage to simplify Scid :-) Sure. As long as this doesn't result in crippling the functionality, I perfectly agree. But though I use probably a lot of functions of Scid, I'm nevertheless completely ignorant of others so I feel it's hard to judge what to drop and what to keep. (For a clear extreme: what if I decided to drop all translations to simplify the program and reduce it's size considerably? ;) cu Alexander ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
