> The only person not too happy about this is Fulvio.
If this is formulated in the spirit of a rational inquiry, this could be
considered as an ad populum.
And it would be false, as I'm not happy either.
If this is formulated in the spirit of a political vote, it is irrelevant,
as the die have already been cast by Alex, which was never the lead dev BTW.
***
Besides, Fulvio has already said it was a matter of principle, **since most
of his code has already been implemented** in Steven's fork.
In doubt, please use quotes.
***
I took a look at the version history yesterday, and saw that Steven did
good work. Fulvio's concerns can be addressed. I surmise it would be easy
to do, if Steven's shadowing was as stellar as described in the revision
history.
What matters is if there's a willingness to do so. As long as everyone
states honestly and sincerely where one stands, any kind of conflict can be
resolved. Mind games leads nowhere.
All this could easily have been prevented. Openness should be valued in
open development. Having a lead dev that goes missing in action did not
help either.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
