>Because it's not my script.
>Because it's not 100% broken.
You pretended to know what to do to fix it, thus, you are not responsible
for all failed solutions that you bring up. You introduced many failed
solutions.
>That your claim not to have flamed can easily be proven false and that
newly minted PHDs in computer science should know better.
There was no such flaming. You're just trying to create an ad-hominem
argument, just like your clinging to the "100%" comment; you know you have
nothing substantiative, so you're desperately trying to find something.
>Because the admission is implied in the many requests you ignored to
scratch your own itch and produce something that would be trivial to a
competent programmer like you, and now dismiss in complete lack of
self-awareness.
Given that you proposed several solutions that did not work (and that I had
already tried myself) this statement makes no sense. In fact, I scratched
your itch and mine.
>http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=124341
No, this wouldn't have worked, at all. This addresses X11 issues that I did
not have. You *still* aren't understanding the problem.
At any rate, someone, other than you, was able to push a patch and fix the
issue. My statement was right in that it was not fully respecting the
TCL_LIBRARY and TK_LIBRARY variables, so he added the location to one of
the directories to be automatically searched.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Ben St-Pierre <benbon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why can't you just admit that your little script is 100% broken?
>
> Because it's not my script.
>
> Because it's not 100% broken.
>
> Because the admission is already in the comment of makefile.conf
>
> Because the admission is implied in the many requests you ignored to
> scratch your own itch and produce something that would be trivial to a
> competent programmer like you, and now dismiss in complete lack of
> self-awareness.
>
> ***
>
> > Not sure what you're trying to say.
>
> That your claim not to have flamed can easily be proven false and that
> newly minted PHDs in computer science should know better.
>
> > Nothing I've said here is false.
>
> Unless you can demonstrate that truth prevents flames, this is irrelevant.
>
> ***
>
> Oh, and my previous search for "compile Scid under Ubuntu" returns this on
> the first page:
>
> http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=124341
>
> Pray tell if this would have worked for you.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scid-users mailing list
> Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
