> But the question is : do this belong to Scid ? Well, it certainly does not harm.
> - there are several applications to play on internet, so we don't > need one more; Depends where. On Mac OS/X there are not that many good FICS clients, for example. > - if Scid works with site A, users will wonder why site B is not > supported; Well, universal reply is 'feel free to add' ;-) > So my opinion is to inhibit this function in Scid but of course > leave it for Scid Pocket, because it fills an hole there. If you leave it in mainline scid, there are more chances to get people support while extending it. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marcin Kasperski | A complex system designed from scratch | http://mekk.waw.pl | never works and cannot be patched to make | | it work. (Booch) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
