2008/9/21 Alexander Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> By the way I find some dialog boxes in Scid a bit ugly ...
>>
>
> What do you have in mind here and what is your definition of
> "ugly"? Just in case some of those few I did need
> improvement.
>
The various options are not always aligned and grouped in the best way (and
Tk 8.4 widgets are not the fanciest).
[...]
Probably using a radio?
>>
>> Annotate seveal games
>> [*] Filter [ ] from current to [spinbox]
>>
>>
>> Yes, of course, but the dialog box is 2 lines bigger ... Notebooks (one
>> tab with "extra options" or "batch annotation") ?
>>
>
> I see this point, my difficulty with a notebook interface
> for the dialogue at hand is, how to split it in a sensible
> way. "Extra options" is most likely a bad thing everywhere,
> as you've hardly an idea what that might be. Its a bit like
> a collector for "everything that did not fit anywhere".
>
Whatever the options layout, what is important is to be able to use Scid on
a screen that is 600 height (I bought a Netbook two days ago :-) ).
>
> A naming like "batch annotations" would be more to my liking
> definitely guiding the users in the first place to what he
> might find there. For the case at hand it would just
> contain, hm, two lines which I do not think is "good enough"
> to justify a whole notebook page.
>
Tab = extra options
Sub Frame = batch annotations
....
Sub Frame = Verbosity
option full line
option NAG only
.....
This makes sense for me, and is user friendly.
[...]
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
