Joost 't Hart wrote:

Hi!

First of all, I never sort a database, but I use some base
of your size equivalent which gets some updates once a year,
some deduping and thereafter compactification.

Some silly points:

- Compact works by writing the Scid base to compact to a
   temporary, potentially sorted, base which is then renamed
   to the original file.  That is, in transit you need twice
   the size of your base on disc, at least.

   Your HDD does not happen to run into a low space state?

   At this point your Linux file systems performacne would
   break down dramatically. (E.g. fragmentation starts and so
   on.)

- I'm not sure where the sorting takes place, but I
   consider Scid just uses the memory for this. For a large
   base quite an amount of RAM might be required. You do not
   run into trouble at this end? (Asking xosview or gkrellm
   or top might give a clue.) However, if this is the case
   I'd suspect it to happen on Windows as well.

- What FS do you use on Linux?

   Some FS do not handle certain usages that well. My default
   for years now is XFS everywhere (except /boot, yes I've a
   partition there) which usually gives a very good
   performance except on deleting a huge numbers of very
   small files (using XFS for a mail server e.g. is usually
   not the best choice).

   I remember, that there was a similar point with this Raiser
   stufff for, AFAIK, larger files (typical for Scid eg.).
   However, it performs quite good on deletion (even
   unintended <scnr/>) and its, AFAIK, still the default on
   SuSE eg.

   To the best of my knowledge, unfortunately, JFS never made
   it into real maturity and had several problems in various
   areas.

   Could it be that you run into such a problem?

- You do not use some mobile disk for your base, e.g. USB?
   Some setups are quite silly concerning caching of such
   attachemnts. In the past I once had a setup that wrote 1.5
   GB into the cache without even starting to flush it. Then
   the system started to swap and got terribly slow. (It was
   a compute server back than and I transfered some
   simulation data...) Ok, this was surely a bug, I think in
   RedHat back then, and I didn't experience this in recent
   setups again. But still, drives that get mounted via HAL
   e.g. usually are not mounted SYNC and this is not always
   the best choice, and I still experience some performance
   break downs due to this sometimes. Usually, this is ok,
   however, today.

-- 

Kind regards,                /                 War is Peace.
                             |            Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner            |         Ignorance is Strength.
                             |
                             | Theory     : G. Orwell, "1984"
                            /  In practice:   USA, since 2001

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to