On 11/29/2010 02:44 AM, Matthew Twomey wrote: Hi,
Good that it works a bit more to your liking now! <zip> > I also did an analysis with Stockfish, and I am noticing one strange > behavior. In the annotation, it's showing a Mate-in-X that is one more > that it should be. For example, it's showing: > > ##### > 46.Ke6+ +-- > Stockfish 1.9.1 JA 64bit: 100:M4 > > (46.Ne4 48:M4 46..Kc8 47.Bg3 Kd8 48.Nc5 Kc8 49.Ra8#) > ##### > > So in the annotation, it's reporting this variation as "M4" but > shouldn't it be showing up as "M3"? When I look at the actual engine > window, it's showing "M3". It's doing this with all mate-in-x I am not sure we are in sync here: The line starting with 46.Ne4 is a mate in 4 moves, ending with 49.Ra8# I cannot see how that should be an M3. As to the engine window, which position is on the board when it shows M3? The position before or after 46.Ne4 has been played? Cheers, Joost. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
