> Why can't you just admit that your little script is 100% broken?
Because it's not my script.
Because it's not 100% broken.
Because the admission is already in the comment of makefile.conf
Because the admission is implied in the many requests you ignored to
scratch your own itch and produce something that would be trivial to a
competent programmer like you, and now dismiss in complete lack of
self-awareness.
***
> Not sure what you're trying to say.
That your claim not to have flamed can easily be proven false and that
newly minted PHDs in computer science should know better.
> Nothing I've said here is false.
Unless you can demonstrate that truth prevents flames, this is irrelevant.
***
Oh, and my previous search for "compile Scid under Ubuntu" returns this on
the first page:
http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=124341
Pray tell if this would have worked for you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
