Steven wrote: > I should also mention, recent Scid git versions have been messing with > the databse backend and (specifically) name frequencies. It's probably best > not to use Scid git for major database work without backing up your > databases, as name corruption is possible, ...
Fulvio wrote: > This is simply not true. Steve's message is true, name corruption is possible, and namebase compaction is not working as expected. The latest git version is writing namebases not conform to the .si4 format. There is a way to fix such a database written with latest git version, use scidt -N <database> and the new namebase will be in .si4 format again. It's probably a good idea to make a backup before fixing the database. Fulvio wrote: > Since your contribution to the Scid project is negative (not only there are > no lines of code written by you, but you even harm the project by spreading > false news) I invited you to leave the Scid project. I cannot understand this, he is definitively not harming the project. I wrote you a message about the problems with the namebase proven by two examples (also confirmed in tests) many weeks ago, and in a reply you've agreed with my analysis. Gregor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Scidvspc-users mailing list Scidvspc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidvspc-users
