The following article was selected from the Internet Edition
of the Chicago Tribune. To visit the site, point your browser
to http://chicagotribune.com/. 
----------- Chicago Tribune Article Forwarding----------------


Article forwarded by: Michael Lach

Return e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Article URL:  
http://chicagotribune.com/news/metro/chicago/article/0,2669,ART-49703,FF.html


---Forwarded article----------------
City teachers rate training as ineffective

By Michael Martinez

Most Chicago Public Schools teachers are being poorly served by the
staff development programs designed to make them better educators,
according to a study released Tuesday.

The report by the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and the Consortium on
Chicago School Research found that teacher training here remains "a
mixed bag" that is "largely a fragmented and individualistic
activity."

In Chicago, professional development for teachers is frequently held
during an afternoon, typically on a Friday after students are
dismissed early, and the principal rounds up the faculty in the school
auditorium to hear an expert's lecture—sometimes with teachers
grading papers instead.

In the study, more than two-thirds of elementary teachers and almost
80 percent of high school teachers surveyed in 1999 found their
training sessions to be of minimal, low or moderate quality.

That means most teachers said their professional
development—which costs tens of millions of dollars a
year—lacked key elements to make it effective, such as follow-up
and adequate time to evaluate new teaching techniques, the study
said.

In addition, 48 percent of principals surveyed said a lack of
knowledge and skills among teachers were "somewhat of a roadblock" to
school improvement, and 16 percent said such a situation was "a
serious roadblock." 

"It is pretty staggering. There is a lot of work to do," the study's
lead author, Mark Smylie, said about the teachers' responses,
including how roughly a fourth said training had little, if any,
professional quality.

"There is no doubt that there is some wonderful stuff going on there,
but there undoubtedly is a lot of stuff out there that is not very
good. One challenge to principals as well as the system is to look at
providers of professional development and ensure they provide a high
quality experience to teachers," said Smylie, a professor of education
at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Added Ken Rolling, executive director of Chicago Annenberg Challenge:
"We think the data is serious enough to warrant a very serious look at
professional development in Chicago."

Chicago school officials disputed some of the study's findings, saying
the "moderate" rating given by teachers could also mean average
quality and not necessarily bad.

Schools chief Paul Vallas offered his own survey of principals
conducted by telephone Monday. That survey showed 70 percent of 365
principals surveyed disagreeing with the statement that teachers' lack
of knowledge and skills were a major roadblock to their school's
improvement.

And 60 percent of principals agreed that the system's professional
development at their school in the past year was excellent, Vallas
said.

Vallas added that Smylie's study showed professional development
programs improved overall from 1997 to 1999 as more teachers gave the
highest rating—about a third of elementary teachers and a fifth
of high school teachers in 1999.

To the system's credit, the study said teacher training was better in
elementary schools on academic probation than those not on probation.


That finding, Vallas said, validated Mayor Richard Daley's takeover of
the city's 601 schools because schools are placed on probation by the
central office.

"Here you have a report that concluded you need greater centralization
and standardization for better professional development, and the irony
of that conclusion is that this report is commissioned by an
organization that supports greater decentralization," Vallas said,
referring to the consortium.

The study urged more training of interactive instruction, which places
less emphasis on lecturing and more on discussion, hands-on activities
and problem solving.

Other consortium studies released Tuesday said the use of interactive
instruction instead of traditional didactic teaching has provided
bigger test gains even in some of the city's worst schools. Improving
teaching will be critical as reading scores in Chicago have flattened
out at some age groups, the studies said. 


-- 
This is the CPS Science Teacher List.

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to