The following article was selected from the Internet Edition
of the Chicago Tribune. To visit the site, point your browser
to http://chicagotribune.com/. 
----------- Chicago Tribune Article Forwarding----------------


Article forwarded by: Cayata Dixon

Return e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Article URL:  
http://chicagotribune.com/news/metro/chicago/article/0,2669,ART-44869,FF.html


---Forwarded article----------------
High school test scores take tumble

By Michael Martinez

After years of steady gains, test scores from Chicago public schools
dipped this spring in high school reading and elementary school math,
erasing two years of improvement.

Elementary school reading, however, continued the climb that began
when Mayor Richard Daley took over the schools in 1995. The results,
released by school officials Thursday, show that 37.8 percent of
pupils in 3rd to 8th grades read at grade level, a bump of 1.6
percentage points over last year's scores.

These mixed results fuel concerns among some that gains from reform
have begun to flatten out. And they come on the heels of Daley's much
publicized campaign to boost reading scores, which had momentarily led
to an open dispute between Daley and schools chief Paul Vallas about
control of the school system. Their dispute ended amicably, and Daley
later held a national conference on reading to emphasize the subject's
importance.

"The mayor has always acknowledged that while there is much to be
proud of in the public schools, there is still a lot more to do and a
long way to go, and today's results underscore the point," Jacquelyn
Heard, Daley's press secretary, said Thursday.

Later this month, the board is expected to announce a reorganization
of top administrators to heed Daley's call for better reading scores.

"Am I satisfied? No, but you still see evidence of progress," Vallas
said of the scores. "I'm glad (elementary) reading scores are up." 

Vallas said the drop in elementary math scores was an expected
"leveling off" after large gains since 1994. This year's scores show
that 43.8 percent of 3rd to 8th graders do math at grade level, 2.6
percentage points below last year's results. 

High school reading scores fell 3.5 percentage points. Results show
that 31.8 percent of 9th and 10th graders now read at grade level, or
national norms.

Reasons for falling scores

Vallas said high school reading scores may have fallen because the
system promoted hundreds of 8th graders last year who failed to pass
their Iowa Tests of Basic Skills but were sent to high school based on
strong classroom grades.

"I'm not making excuses about high school reading, but we anticipated
that the classroom weightings (used in promoting 8th graders last
year) were going to make some impact. A lot of kids were promoted (to
high school) who had strong classroom performance but not strong test
scores."

Vallas also said his high schools may not have taken this year's Tests
of Achievement and Proficiency seriously because the system is going
to use another standardized test next year. Under a trial of that test
this year, high school students did better in reading compared with
the TAP, but worse in math when compared with TAP scores from recent
years.

Critics of Daley's centralized control of the system say the results
signal a setback. They pointed out how the Chicago system has used one
1988 version of the Iowa Test six times in the last six years in May,
August and January testing sessions.

"I find it shocking that the scores haven't gone up more than they
have just by virtue of using a familiar test," said Julie Woestehoff
of Parents United for Responsible Education. "I don't think that what
they're doing is working."

Don Moore of Designs for Change said this year's results show "the
pace of improvement is not being sustained."

"They've given the same test repeatedly, and the research shows
nationally, the impact of teaching to the test wears out. I think
that's what's happening here," Moore said.

Vallas intends to use a 2000 version of the Iowa Test in elementary
grades next year.



Some experts were upbeat over the test scores.

"I was kind of surprised to see the elementary reading scores continue
to go up because we had been seeing these declining gains in the last
couple of years, but they went up considerably," said John Q. Easton,
deputy director of the Consortium on Chicago School Research.

But the falling high school scores, another expert said, spell trouble
for Chicago's nationally watched ban on "social promotions," which is
the practice of automatically promoting students to the next grade.
The Chicago system has steadily raised the test-passing mark for the
promotion of 3rd, 6th and 8th graders, but it recently began
considering good grades as a mitigating circumstance for promotion.



Social promotion ban debated

School districts around the country are considering following
Chicago's lead on banning social promotions, and some experts see the
new test scores as an indicator of some pitfalls.

"They weren't equipped to holding (a large number of low-performing
8th graders) back, and probably this is what you're going to see on a
national stage. ... Chicago is living through what's going to be a
national nightmare," said Mary Ann Rafoth, professor of educational
and school psychology at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Next year, Chicago plans to use different nationally standardized
tests in 9th and 10th grades that are preparation tests for the ACT,
which is given to all 11th graders by the state board of education.



Under pilot testing this year of the new 9th grade test -- called
Explore -- the number of Chicago freshmen meeting national norms was
35 percent in reading, 32 percent in English grammar, 35 percent in
math and 31 percent in science.

Taking the 10th-grade test -- called Plan -- sophomores fared better:
52 percent met norms in reading, 35 percent met norms in English
grammar, 43 percent met norms in math and 49 percent met norms in
science.




----------------------------------------------------
This is the CPS Mathematics Teacher Discussion List. 

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to