Aha! I actually did _not_ noticed that. Ty! On Feb 27, 2013 9:31 AM, "Steven Haigh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/02/2013 1:11 AM, Andrew Z wrote: > >> Hello, >> I observed a 6x times perf degradation on ping times with iptables >> (about 30 rules) turned on. >> Just curios if there are alternatives to iptables? >> I found this project, but it has no new releases since 2005. >> http://www.hipac.org/status/**news.html<http://www.hipac.org/status/news.html> >> Here are the details >> http://www.linuxquestions.org/**questions/linux-networking-3/** >> iptables-drastic-decrease-in-**ping-time-4175451842/<http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/iptables-drastic-decrease-in-ping-time-4175451842/> >> > > Have you noticed you're actually pinging 3 different hosts? > > 1) PING yahoo.com (98.138.253.109) > 2) PING yahoo.com (98.139.183.24) > 3) PING yahoo.com (206.190.36.45) > > What makes you think that is iptables based? > > -- > Steven Haigh > > Email: [email protected] > Web: http://www.crc.id.au > Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 > Fax: (03) 8338 0299 > >
