On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Steven Haigh <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have no doubt that something will come of it - watch this space. When > it does happen, we all win. Cool. We didn't have visibility into the git history of RHEL source code before, so the visibility into the git history of CentOS as a the "published open source and free software for Red Hat" is an interesting change. But yes, I do understand your concern about provenance. Looking at it, my concern is that there's not a graceful way to get a list of all the git repos for actual packages published, only a web interface, and the distinction between CentOS packages and RHEL published packages is unclear. That's quite distinct from a directory full of SRPM's that can be listed and parsed from a canonical web directory and yum repository. I'm also afraid that the web interface at git.centos.org is making my eyes bleed.....
