On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Steve Gaarder <[email protected]> wrote: > I always thought that /usr/local was defined to be an area left alone by the > operating system. For many years, we have made it a symlink to a read-only > directory in AFS space. This has worked fine - until now. When I tried to > update the "filesystem" package, it failed because it tried to do chmods on > (at least) /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/etc. Why is it doing this? Is > /usr/local no longer truly local? > > thanks,
- Filesystem package messes with /usr/local Steve Gaarder
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr/local Tom H
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr/local Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr/local Nico Kadel-Garcia
- RE: Filesystem package messes with /usr/loc... Benjamin Lefoul
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr/loc... Steve Gaarder
- RE: Filesystem package messes with /usr... Benjamin Lefoul
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr... Nico Kadel-Garcia
- RE: Filesystem package messes with... Benjamin Lefoul
- Re: Filesystem package messes ... Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: Filesystem package mes... Steve Gaarder
- Re: Filesystem package messes with /usr/loc... Larry Linder
